Search
Powered by Google
Home
This Month
Editorial
The Endothelium – What Difference do SiH Lenses Make?
>
more
Meeting Synopsis
American Academy of Optometry 2009 Meeting, part 1
>
more
Posters
Does Tear Exchange Differ Between SiH Contact Lens Types?
>
more
In The Practice
Endothelium and SiH lens fitting considerations
>
more
Tell a friend
> Home
> About Us
> Affiliates
> Contact Us
> Disclaimer
> Site Map

 

Quick Vote:
Do you typically record endothelial conditions in contact lens wearers? click

 

Would you like to subscribe to our monthly newsletter? > click

 




The Silicone Hydrogels website is partially supported through an educational grant from CIBA VISION

 
Posters | Archive
September 2008

 

Lactoferrin Uptake Kinetics on SiH and Conventional Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials

Lakshman N Subbaraman1 ,BSOptom, MSc, FAAO, Lisa M Chow1, BSc, Heather Sheardown2, PhD, Lyndon Jones1, PhD, FCOptom, FAAO

1 Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

 

PURPOSE: To compare the kinetics of lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel (SH) and FDA group II (GpII) and group IV (GpIV) conventional hydrogel contact lens materials by artificially doping lenses with 125I labeled lactoferrin solution.

METHODS: Seven different contact lens materials - two conventional (etafilcon A - GpIV and omafilcon A - GpII) and five SH (lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, balafilcon A, galyfilcon A and senofilcon A) were incubated in 1 ml of simple lactoferrin solution containing 125I labeled lactoferrin. The lenses were incubated for time periods ranging from 1 hour to 28 days at 37 °C with constant shaking. Following the specified incubation period, the lenses were rinsed briefly with phosphate buffered saline to remove unbound protein and were then placed in polypropylene tubes. The radioactive counts on the lens materials were determined using an Automatic Gamma Counter.

RESULTS: There was a gradual increase in lactoferrin deposition on all the lenses across all time points. At the end of 28 days the amount of lactoferrin/lens in µg was 11.3±1.9 for etafilcon A, 6.8±2.0 for omafilcon A, 2.1±0.9 for lotrafilcon A, 3.1±1.0 for lotrafilcon B, 11.8±2.9 for balafilcon A, 5.4±1.1 for galyfilcon A and 5.6±0.6 for senofilcon A. After 28 days, etafilcon A and balafilcon A deposited lactoferrin to the greatest degree (p<0.05), but these were not different from each other (p=0.48), while lotrafilcon A and B deposited the least (p<0.05 vs other lenses; p=0.57 with each other). Galyfilcon A, senofilcon A and omafilcon A lens materials deposited intermediate levels of lactoferrin (p<0.05 compared with other lenses; p>0.05 with each other).

CONCLUSIONS:
Radiochemical analysis is a sensitive and effective technique to determine the small quantities of lactoferrin deposited on SH lenses. Kinetics of lactoferrin deposition on contact lens materials varies depending on the chemical structure of the lens material under consideration.

Download PDF of Poster:
Download - 107KB
You will need Version 4 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some documents on this site. You can get the latest version from the Adobe Home site. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All rights reserved, copyright 2002 - 2007 siliconehydrogels.org