This web site is no longer actively maintained. Please visit for up to date information.
Powered by Google
This Month
Ocular Surface Characteristics of the Asian Eye
Meeting Synopsis
Academy 2010
pective Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Contact Lens Induced Inflammatory Events During Continuous Wear
Feature Review
Adequate tear mixing under a soft contact lens may play an important role in minimizing certain > more
Tell a friend
> Home
> About Us
> Affiliates
> Contact Us
> Disclaimer
> Site Map


The Silicone Hydrogels website is partially supported through an educational grant from CIBA VISION

Posters | Archive
June 2007


Oxygen Permeability of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials

Philip B. Morgan [1], Nathan Efron [2], Ian D. Cameron [1], Marie Goodwin [1], Noel A. Brennan [3]

[1] Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, UK; [2] Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; [3] Brennan Consultants, Melbourne, Australia


To measure the oxygen permeability (Dk) of currently- available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.

Permeability was measured in a randomized and masked manner for the following silicone hydrogel contact lens materials: Acuvue Advance, Acuvue Oasys, Focus Night & Day, O2 Optix and PureVision.  Two conventional hydrogel lens materials, Etafilcon A and pHEMA, were measured as controls. We used an extended version of the polarographic measurement method described in ISO 9913-1. Stacks of 1-6 -1.00DS contact lenses were evaluated, with each stack measured twice. The resulting value for t/Dk (derived from electrode current and mathematically correcting for the edge effect) was plotted against t for each stack, with Dk calculated as the inverse of the gradient of this relationship; this latter method corrects for the boundary effect.

Measured permeability values (+/- 95% CI), and manufacturer- claimed values in parentheses, were: Acuvue Advance 75.2 +/- 9.8 (60), Acuvue Oasys 107.4 +/- 7.4 (103), Focus Night & Day 162.0 +/- 9.8 (140), O2 Optix 80.5 +/- 4.9 (110), PureVision 75.9 +/- 6.6 (99), Etafilcon 21.0 +/- 1.0 (21) and pHEMA 8.2 +/- 0.7 (7.5).

Our values were broadly similar to manufacturer-claimed values for the two reference materials and the Acuvue Oasys lens. It is unclear whether some manufacturers have accounted for edge and/or boundary effects, and some manufacturers may have used a different measurement methodology (coulometric); these factors may account for discrepancies between our data and that of manufacturers. Our extended ISO methodology has generated data points with small 95% confidence intervals, suggesting that the use of the polarographic method of oxygen permeability measurement can be successfully employed with hyper-permeable contact lens materials.

Download PDF of Poster:
Download - 396 KB
You will need Version 4 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some documents on this site. You can get the latest version from the Adobe Home site. 
All rights reserved, copyright 2002 - 2007