This web site is no longer actively maintained. Please visit for up to date information.
Powered by Google
This Month
Ocular Surface Characteristics of the Asian Eye
Meeting Synopsis
Academy 2010
pective Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Contact Lens Induced Inflammatory Events During Continuous Wear
Feature Review
Adequate tear mixing under a soft contact lens may play an important role in minimizing certain > more
Tell a friend
> Home
> About Us
> Affiliates
> Contact Us
> Disclaimer
> Site Map


The Silicone Hydrogels website is partially supported through an educational grant from CIBA VISION

Posters | Archive
January 2006


An Evaluation of Soft Lens Fit in Relation to Corneal Topography

Graeme Young1, Cristina Schnider2, Chris Hunt1, Suzanne Efron3, Nathan Efron3

1Visioncare Research Ltd, 2Vistakon, 3Eurolens Research


PURPOSE: To determine which ocular topography variables affect soft contact lens fit.

METHODS: Fifty subjects each wore three soft lenses in succession (Vistakon ACUVUE® 2 and Acuvue 2 [A2], Vistakon ACUVUE® ADVANCE™ [AA], Ciba Focus® NIGHT & DAY™ [N&D]) and various aspects of lens fit were evaluated. The steeper base curves of each type were worn in one eye and the flatter base curve in the other eye. Corneal topography data were collected using a Medmont E300 corneal topographer (Camberwell, Australia). As well as corneal curvature (CC) and shape factor (SF), corneal height (CH) was measured over a 10mm chord and also the maximum measurable diameter. These were measured in the horizontal (h), vertical (v), steepest and flattest meridians. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test for associations between lens fit and ocular variables. A P-value of 0.01 or less was taken to indicate a statistically significant correlation.

RESULTS: With each lens type, the steeper base curve provided the best fit on the greatest proportion of eyes. For each lens type, there was no significant difference in mean K-reading between those eyes best fit with the steeper base curve and those eyes best fit with the flatter base curve. All three lens types showed significant positive correlations between centration and both CHv and CHh (maximum), increasing CH resulted in greater decentration. With A2, there were also some negative correlations between centration and some of the SF measurements. Interestingly, there were no correlations between corneal topography and tightness on push-up or post-blink movement. The assessment of overall fit correlated with CH, and SF; better lens fit was associated with greater CHh and lower corneal asphericity (i.e. greater SFv & SFh). A correlation with comfort was noted with only one lens; poorer comfort with N&D was associated with greater CH.

CONCLUSIONS: The best-fit base curve is not predicted by keratometry. The most consistent correlation between lens fit and corneal topography is that between centration and corneal sagittal height.

Download PDF of Poster:
Download - 54 KB
You will need Version 4 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some documents on this site. You can get the latest version from the Adobe Home site. 
All rights reserved, copyright 2002 - 2007